As Twitter quickly grows as a preferred online hub for the dissemination of ideas, more and more businesses are joining the "twittersphere" in hopes of connecting with and influencing potential customers. The uber-popular social media site can be a great public relations tool for establishing and promoting a brand, but when done carelessly, it can also damage reputations. Several businesses have demonstrated the risks associated with using such an influential idea-sharing channel.
Earlier this year, McDonalds launched a PR campaign on Twitter with the intent of generating stories of positive customer experiences. On January 18, the company sent out two tweets:
When you make something w/pride, people can taste it, - McD potato supplier #McDStories
Meet some of the hard-working people dedicated to providing McD's with quality food every day -#McDStories
Armed with the newly created #McDStories hashtag and links to information about hardworking potato farmers, the company was ready for the positive customer stories to start rolling in. Instead, the PR plan seemed to backfire. Twitter users had a field day bashing the company though its own hashtag:
Dude, I used to work at McDonald's. The #McDStories I could tell would raise your hair.
One time I walked into McDonalds and I could smell the Type 2 diabetes floating in the air and I threw up. #McDStories
McDStories I just read that McDonalds chicken nuggets have a foaming agent in them, similar to products used for building materials.
#McDStories I lost 50 lbs in 6 months after I quit working and eating at McDonald's.
The branded hashtag was certainly a hit, but not in the way that McDonald's had intended. This PR disaster proved the dangers involved in allowing your audience to control your brand's conversation. The "throw it up and see if it sticks" mentality didn't seem to work so well. Chances are the fast-food giant will keep the ball in its own court and stick to paid advertising for now.
McDonald's made an honest attempt to build buzz around its brand. However, some companies just go for the cheap shot. In February 2011, clothing designer Kenneth Cole attempted to bring attention to his brand by making light of the political issues in Egypt. Using the hashtag #Cairo, he tweeted:
Millions are in uproar in #Cairo. Rumor is they heard our new spring collection is now available online at http:/bit.ly/KCairo - KC
Needless to say, Twitter audiences did not find the humor as effective as Mr. Cole might have hoped. The tweet was shared and bahsed by thousands of people in teh several hours ithat it was up on the website. After deleting the insensitive tweet, the designer did fashion an apology via Facebook:
"I apologize to everyone who was offended by my insensitive tweet about the situation in Egypt. I've dedicated my life to raising awareness about serious social issues, and in hindsight my attempt at humor reagarding a nation liberating themselves against oppression was poorly timed and absolutely inappropriate." Kenneth Cole, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
While the apology may have helped, it was too late for Cole's reputation. A fake Twitter account @KennethColePR was created, and still exists, to further poke fun at Cole's online gaffe. Here's an example:
Our new slingback pumps would make Anne Frank come out of hiding! #KennethColeTweet
While some brands like Kenneth Cole and McDonald's simply failed at an attempt to positively influence audiences, other companies create poor reputations by just not paying close attention. This was the case for StubHub, which posted this message via its corporate Twitter account in early October:
Thank f*** it's Friday! Can't wait to get out of this stubsucking hell hole.
This was just an unfortunate case in which an employee simply forgot to log out of the company account before posting his/her personal messages. As if fleeting expletives weren't enough to shock audiences, the employee insulted the brand itself. StubHub did issue an apology, but the influence of social media proved too powerful to erase the incident from the public's memory.
These online screw-ups make it apparent that Twitter is a battlefield for influence. With so much possibility for negative imaging, is it worth the risk for brands to utlize social media channels? Some people will say any publicity is good publicity, but that can certainly be debated.
So, what do you think? Is it worth taking the risk of facing social media scrutiny, or should some companies just steer clear of the "twittersphere"?
~Scott Clark, Rodney Hardee, Thomas Smith
Earlier this year, McDonalds launched a PR campaign on Twitter with the intent of generating stories of positive customer experiences. On January 18, the company sent out two tweets:
When you make something w/pride, people can taste it, - McD potato supplier #McDStories
Meet some of the hard-working people dedicated to providing McD's with quality food every day -#McDStories
Armed with the newly created #McDStories hashtag and links to information about hardworking potato farmers, the company was ready for the positive customer stories to start rolling in. Instead, the PR plan seemed to backfire. Twitter users had a field day bashing the company though its own hashtag:
Dude, I used to work at McDonald's. The #McDStories I could tell would raise your hair.
One time I walked into McDonalds and I could smell the Type 2 diabetes floating in the air and I threw up. #McDStories
McDStories I just read that McDonalds chicken nuggets have a foaming agent in them, similar to products used for building materials.
#McDStories I lost 50 lbs in 6 months after I quit working and eating at McDonald's.
The branded hashtag was certainly a hit, but not in the way that McDonald's had intended. This PR disaster proved the dangers involved in allowing your audience to control your brand's conversation. The "throw it up and see if it sticks" mentality didn't seem to work so well. Chances are the fast-food giant will keep the ball in its own court and stick to paid advertising for now.
McDonald's made an honest attempt to build buzz around its brand. However, some companies just go for the cheap shot. In February 2011, clothing designer Kenneth Cole attempted to bring attention to his brand by making light of the political issues in Egypt. Using the hashtag #Cairo, he tweeted:
Millions are in uproar in #Cairo. Rumor is they heard our new spring collection is now available online at http:/bit.ly/KCairo - KC
Needless to say, Twitter audiences did not find the humor as effective as Mr. Cole might have hoped. The tweet was shared and bahsed by thousands of people in teh several hours ithat it was up on the website. After deleting the insensitive tweet, the designer did fashion an apology via Facebook:
"I apologize to everyone who was offended by my insensitive tweet about the situation in Egypt. I've dedicated my life to raising awareness about serious social issues, and in hindsight my attempt at humor reagarding a nation liberating themselves against oppression was poorly timed and absolutely inappropriate." Kenneth Cole, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
While the apology may have helped, it was too late for Cole's reputation. A fake Twitter account @KennethColePR was created, and still exists, to further poke fun at Cole's online gaffe. Here's an example:
Our new slingback pumps would make Anne Frank come out of hiding! #KennethColeTweet
While some brands like Kenneth Cole and McDonald's simply failed at an attempt to positively influence audiences, other companies create poor reputations by just not paying close attention. This was the case for StubHub, which posted this message via its corporate Twitter account in early October:
Thank f*** it's Friday! Can't wait to get out of this stubsucking hell hole.
This was just an unfortunate case in which an employee simply forgot to log out of the company account before posting his/her personal messages. As if fleeting expletives weren't enough to shock audiences, the employee insulted the brand itself. StubHub did issue an apology, but the influence of social media proved too powerful to erase the incident from the public's memory.
These online screw-ups make it apparent that Twitter is a battlefield for influence. With so much possibility for negative imaging, is it worth the risk for brands to utlize social media channels? Some people will say any publicity is good publicity, but that can certainly be debated.
So, what do you think? Is it worth taking the risk of facing social media scrutiny, or should some companies just steer clear of the "twittersphere"?
~Scott Clark, Rodney Hardee, Thomas Smith
3:23 PM
CAS: 302 Social Influence

















